Narottamprasad Surajdin Pandey Vs ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Narottamprasad Surajdin Pandey, has filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 04/03/2024 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee has raised grounds of appeal against the addition of Rs. 7,28,923/- made under Section 68 of the Act, the addition of Rs. 2,82,355/- made under Section 68 of the Act on account of Sundry Creditors outstanding, and the addition of Rs. 9,81,256/- being disallowance of labour wages pertaining to specific persons. The assessee has submitted that the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) did not consider the evidence filed by the assessee. The assessee has also requested for personal hearing and the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A).…

Legal Issues

• 1. The assessee has raised grounds of appeal against the addition of Rs. 7,28,923/- made under Section 68 of the Act.
• 2. The assessee has raised grounds of appeal against the addition of Rs. 2,82,355/- made under Section 68 of the Act on account of Sundry Creditors outstanding.
• 3. The assessee has raised grounds of appeal against the addition of Rs. 9,81,256/- being disallowance of labour wages pertaining to specific persons.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Krishna Raj Educational Society Vs Income Tax Officer(E)

  Delhi Bench ‘D’, New Delhi benchAY 2013-14Partly Allowed

• Aman Jain vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward 34(5), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi benchAY 2021-22Allowed

• Giasuddin Shaikh Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Kolkata bench

• M/s Baba Builders vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Allahabad bench

• Sh. Praveen Gupta Vs. ACIT, New Delhi

  Delhi Benches 'F', New Delhi benchAY 2008-09Dismissed

• ANKISH MADHAN Vs. ITO WARD 29(1), DELHI

  Delhi bench