Skip to main content

MUJAHID Vs DCIT

Case No: ITA Nos. 3882, 3883, 3884, 3885, 3886 & 3887/Del/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Date: 1/14/2026

Parties Involved

appellantMUJAHID
respondentDCIT

Facts Summary

This bunch of 06 appeals filed by the assessee, MUJAHID, are preferred against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-3, Noida, relevant to assessment years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 respectively. The appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience, with the assessment year 2015-16 being the lead case. The appellant submitted that the Assessing Officer (AO) passed an exparte order without gi

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the AO passed an exparte order without giving sufficient opportunity to the assessee?
  • 2. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) passed an exparte and non-speaking order?

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning