Skip to main content

Ms. Rohini Vs. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Range 2, Madurai

Case No: 2533/CHNY/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘B’ Bench, Chennai
Date: 1/5/2026

Parties Involved

appellantMs. Rohini
respondentThe Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Range 2, Madurai

Facts Summary

This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 10.07.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The relevant Assessment Year is 2017-18. The order passed by the First Appellate Authority (FAA) was ex-parte as the assessee did not respond to three notices issued. Similarly, the impugned penalty order passed under section 271D of the Act by the Assessing Officer (AO) was also

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the ex-parte order passed by the First Appellate Authority (FAA) is valid?
  • 2. Whether the ex-parte penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) is valid?

1 more legal issue analysed in this judgement.

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning