MOOL CHANDRA...APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR....RESPONDENTS
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appellant was appointed to Indian Statistical Services in 1982 and was promoted to various positions over the years. He was suspended and charged with deserting his family and living with another woman. An inquiry was conducted, and the appellant was found guilty of deserting his family but not of living with another woman. He was dismissed from service but later reinstated with a minor penalty. The appellant sought complete exoneration and promotions, which were denied. He filed multiple appeals and writ petitions challenging the penalty and the denial of his requests. The High Court dismissed his writ petitions, and he appealed to the Supreme Court.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the writ petition on the ground of unexplained delay?
- 2. Whether the Tribunal erred in not condoning the delay of 425 days in filing the fresh O.A.?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
4 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Kewal Krishan v. Rajesh Kumar & Ors.
Supreme Court benchSooriya Hospital Rep. by its Partner, Dr.C.P.Sreekumar vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
AY 2014-15AllowedNew Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
Supreme Court benchUnion of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal
Supreme Court benchDCIT, VS. RAJAN KUMAR
Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2013-14DismissedShri Umesh Saboo vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-2, Jaipur
Jaipur bench