Minacle Traexim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income tax Officer, Ward-17(2), Delhi

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The captioned appeal, preferred by the assessee Minacle Traexim Pvt. Ltd., is directed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 25.04.2025, arising out of the order dated 22.12.2019 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(2), Delhi, under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2017-18. None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the hearing despite notice having been sent. The appeal was heard ex parte after the Learned Departmental Representative (DR) presented the case and the materials available on record were perused.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the appeal should be allowed despite the absence of the assessee?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA VS. ITO, WARD 49(1)

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Mahesh Kumar vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2012-13Allowed

• Vijay Garg Vs. Income Tax Officer

  E Bench, Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Pradeep Kumar vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2009-10Allowed

• Raj Kumar vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12Allowed

• Sh. Raman Singh Sidhu Vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2006-07 to 2007-08, 2011-12 to 2012-13 & 2008-09 to 2010-11Dismissed