Mehul Nisar vs. ACIT-Circle-20(2)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Mr. Mehul Nisar, filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for assessment year 2017-18. The assessee challenged the disallowance of expenses claimed against short term capital gains. The key issues were the equal division of the cost of acquisition of two flats among four co-owners, disallowance of interest on borrowed capital, disallowance of transfer fees, and disallowance of brokerage fees. The Tribunal allowed the appeal on certain grounds and dismissed it on others.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Equal division of cost of acquisition of two flats among four co-owners
• 2. Disallowance of interest on borrowed capital
• 3. Disallowance of transfer fees
• 4. Disallowance of brokerage fees

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Dilip Mohandas Devani vs. Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• Mr. Colathur N. Ram Vs. ACIT 35(1)

  Mumbai bench

• Ram Niranjan Banka Vs. ACIT, Circle-40

  D Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2014-15Allowed

• Pawan Edifice Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

  Ahmedabad bench

• Shri Vadagur Narayanappa Premachandra Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle – 2(1), Bangalore

  Bangalore benchAY 2011-12Allowed

• Satyajae Shanbor Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi bench