Marut Prasanth Gogineni vs. Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Marut Prasanth Gogineni, filed an updated return of income under Section 139(8A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, declaring an income of Rs. 10,918/-. Based on information from the Insight Portal under the Risk Management Strategy, the Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under Section 147 of the Act. The AO issued notices under Sections 148A(b) and 148 of the Act, which were not responded to by the assessee. Consequently, the AO determined the assessee's total income at Rs. 3,53,19,030/-, attributing the excess amount to unexplained money under Section 69A of the Act. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the assessee failed to respond to notices for hearing the appeal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in disposing of the appeal ex parte?
• 2. Whether the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was sustainable?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Sultania Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. I.T.O., Ward 5(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata ‘D’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2018-19Partly Allowed

• Hashmat Ishaq Parker vs Income Tax Officer

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2015-16, 2018-19Allowed

• ITO VS ANNAMALAI

• Nevin H. Bharwani v/s Income Tax Officer (International Taxation)

• Income Tax Officer, Ward-50(1), Room No. 1408, E-2, Block, Dr. S. P. M. Civic Centre, New Delhi vs The Silk Factory, Central Circle-29, Nehru Enclave, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019

  Delhi Bench ‘G’, New Delhi benchAY 2019-20Dismissed

• M/s Blackstone Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 5(1)

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2016-17 & 2018-19Allowed