Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Manoj Kumar Yadav, is an individual engaged in the business of grains. He e-filed his return of income on 11.07.2017 showing a total income of Rs. 4,56,610/-. His case was selected for complete scrutiny, and statutory notices were issued but not complied with. The Assessing Officer (AO) found that a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- deposited on 14.11.2016 was not satisfactorily explained, leading to the rejection of the assessee's books of account and addition of this amount to his total income as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Aggrieved by this, the assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), who dismissed the appeal. The assessee then filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in the calculation of assessed income.
- 2. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
2 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Srivaru Agro Pvt. Ltd. (Successor to Manoj Mercantile Credit Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. A.C.I.T., CC-1(4), Kolkata
Kolkata 'SMC' Bench benchAY 2016-17Partly AllowedShri Ramesh Yadav Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(5), Gurgaon
Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi benchAY 2014-15AllowedBabulal Mulchand Varma Vs. Asst. CIT Central Circle-4(3)
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2009-10 & 2010-11AllowedSandeep Poddar Vs. A.C.I.T., Circle-50(1), Kolkata
Kolkata ‘D’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2015-16Partly AllowedKuldeep Singh Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-68(2), Delhi
Manoj Kumar Saha & Sons HUF Vs. I.T.O., Ward-44(3), Kolkata
Kolkata ‘C’ Bench benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed