Manjeet Kaur Duggal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 52 Delhi
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The petitioner, Manjeet Kaur Duggal, has filed a petition challenging the order dated 15.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice dated 15.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act in respect of the Assessment Year 2013-14. The petitioner argues that the impugned order was issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation and that the income alleged to have escaped assessment neither exceeded ₹50.00 Lacs nor was likely to exceed ₹50.00 Lacs. The petitioner also prayed that the Assessing Officer be restrained from taking any steps pursuant to the impugned notice. The Court passed an interim order allowing the proceedings to continue but any adverse order would not be given effect to until further directions of the Court.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the impugned order was issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation.
- 2. Whether the conditions to attract the provisions of Section 149(1)(b) of the Act are satisfied.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
AECOM India P Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench 'I' benchAY 2010-11, 2011-12AllowedCosmo Films Ltd.
Delhi Bench benchAY 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13AllowedBT India Private Limited vs ACIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18 & 2018-19AllowedFENA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs Addl./Joint/ Deputy/ACIT/ITO, National Faceless Asst. Centre, (NaFAC), Delhi
Oracal India Vs. Addl. CIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2007-08AllowedAthena Hisar Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT
Delhi “H” Bench: New Delhi benchAY 2021-22Allowed