Manish Malik vs DCIT, Circle-27(1), New Delhi

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The Assessing Officer received information regarding a cash deposit of Rs. 10,00,000/- by the assessee in his bank account during FY 2010-11. The assessee had declared NIL income. The case was reopened, and the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee responded, and a notice under section 143(2) was issued. The Assessing Officer rejected the explanation offered by the assessee and made additions of Rs. 10,00,000/- and Rs. 1,15,39,144/-. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who partly allowed the appeal, sustaining an addition of Rs. 1,15,16,924/-. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) considered the documents and information submitted by the assessee's authorized representative.
• 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ignored the submissions and arguments made by the assessee.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Kalpana Nitin Shah Vs. ITO 19(2)(2)

  SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2011-12Partly Allowed

• Trinity Enclave Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Ward 4(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Gurpreet Singh Dhillon Vs DCIT

• Bholenath Foods Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2012-13Remanded

• Somdutt Bansal vs. Income Tax Officer 2(2), Lashkar, Gwalior

  Agra bench

• Shuklatirth Seva Sahakari Mandli Ltd. Vs. ITO(E)

  Ahmedabad bench