Mahendrabhai Patel vs. ITO, Ward-3(3)(2) Ahmedabad
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Mahendrabhai Patel, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 31.03.2014, declaring income of Rs.3,22,991/-. The Assessing Officer received information indicating that the assessee had jointly sold an immovable property for Rs.72,00,000/-. The assessee did not report any capital gain from the sale. The Assessing Officer issued notices under section 148, 142(1), and a final show cause notice, but the assessee did not comply. The AO completed the assessment ex parte, holding that the entire 50% share of the sale consideration, amounting to Rs.37,76,400/-, was assessable as capital gain. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), but the appeal was dismissed ex parte for non-compliance.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without giving a fair and adequate opportunity of hearing.
- 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 37,76,400/- made by the Assessing Officer as capital gains without properly appreciating the facts of the case and without considering the absence of proper representation due to genuine reasons.
- 3. Whether the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to determine the actual capital gains in accordance with law by not reducing the cost of acquisition, improvement, and eligible deductions from the sale consideration under section 48 of the Income Tax Act.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
4 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Hariprasad Vedasubramanian vs Income Tax Officer
Tawfiqur Rahman
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2013-2014AllowedShashi Kant Chaurasia Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19 & 2019-20Partly AllowedAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Ahmedabad vs. Rakeshkumar Jayantilal Patel
Ahmedabad benchGaurav Dye House Vs. ITO
Delhi 'E' Bench benchAY 2022-23AllowedEbay Singapore Services Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2019-20Allowed