Madhusudhanarao Ramisetty vs. Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Madhusudhanarao Ramisetty, carried out substantial financial transactions during the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17 but did not file his return of income. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and issued notices under section 148A(b) and section 148 of the Act. The assessee failed to respond to the notices, leading the AO to issue an order under section 148A(d) of the Act. The AO called for bank account copies from Andhra Bank, revealing cash deposits of Rs.55,43,000/-. The AO treated these deposits as unexplained money under section 69A of the Act and determined the assessee's income at Rs.55,43,000/-. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) but the appeal was delayed by 163 days due to a spinal cord injury. The Commissioner declined to condone the delay and dismissed the appeal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal?
• 2. Whether the notice issued under section 148 of the Act is valid?
• 3. Whether the notice issued under section 148A(b) of the Act is valid?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Sajja Kiran Kumar vs. The Income Tax Officer

  Visakhapatnam bench

• Andhra Pradesh Medical Services and Infrastructure Development Corporation vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1), Guntur

  Visakhapatnam bench

• The Tiruchendur Co-op. Prmary Co-operative Society Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Tuticorin

• Parthasarathi Prabakaran Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Vellore

• The Hisar Leading Bank Co-Op Non-Agri Thrift & Credit Society Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1

• Devindra Singh vs. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2015-16Allowed