M/s V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The case involves multiple appeals by M/s V.V. Titanium Pigments Pvt. Ltd. against assessments made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee challenged the additions made by the Assessing Officer on grounds such as sales suppression, unexplained investments, unaccounted scrap sales, bogus expenses, unaccounted cash receipts, and alleged manipulation in the accounts. The appeals were heard and decided by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Sales suppression
• 2. Unexplained investments
• 3. Unaccounted scrap sales
• 4. Bogus expenses
• 5. Unaccounted cash receipts
• 6. Manipulation in the accounts

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Mr. Abdul Rahim Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

  Chennai bench

• Deepak V. Hardeep Motors v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

  Chennai bench

• Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

  Amritsar bench

• Amar Kumar Agarwal vs DCIT, CC 4(3)

  Kolkata benchAY 2017-18 to 2021-22Partly Allowed

• Bina Goenka The Jeweller LLP vs. Asst. CIT Circle-25(2)

  Mumbai bench

• Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 4(2), New Delhi vs. Carrissa Investments Pvt. Ltd.

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2014-15Dismissed