M/s Utkal Builders Ltd vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1), Kolkata
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, M/s Utkal Builders Ltd, has appealed against the orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (CIT(A)) for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18. The assessee has contested the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the CIT(A) on various grounds, including the failure to provide proper opportunity to present its case, improper disallowance of interest on unsecured loans, and incorrect revenue recognition for property sales. The assessee has also argued that the assessment order was passed on a gazetted holiday, violating the principles of natural justice.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Confirmation of addition of Rs.5,56,62,541/- u/s 68 without considering the submission of the assessee.
- 2. Estimated disallowance of Rs.3,07,03,743/- at the rate of 10% of total construction cost.
- 3. Direction to treat sales as complete on receipt of 60% of the sale consideration.
- 4. Setting aside the difference of Rs.28,19,460/- being rental income.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
5 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
M/s. S S Group (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1)
Delhi Bench ‘G’ benchAY 2015-16, 2016-17Partly AllowedDCIT, Central Circle-4, New Delhi Vs. M/s. Easy Trip Planner Pvt. Ltd
Delhi Bench benchAY 2012-13 to 2017-18DismissedM/s Sai Builders and Developers vs. PCIT, Mumbai-27
Mumbai 'F' Bench benchAY 2017-18DismissedDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1) Vs. Krish Icon
Delhi Bench "C", Delhi benchAY 2016-17DismissedDCIT, Circle-5(1), Kolkata vs. Bandhan Bank Ltd., Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2020-21DismissedRudra Infra Projects vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai "D" Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed