Skip to main content

M/s. Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

Case No: ITA Nos.9 to 12/Hyd/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad
Date: 23 Sep 2026

Parties Involved

appellantM/s. Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited
respondentAsstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3(2) Hyderabad

Facts Summary

The assessee, M/s. Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited, is a company engaged in the business of providing IT-enabled services and BPO services. The assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 on 25.11.2011, declaring total income of Rs. 75,71,189/-. The Assessing Officer passed the assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 144C(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 31.12.2015, making, inter alia, an addition of Rs. 13,00,56,397/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and determining the total income of the assessee at Rs. 28,42,01,891/-. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee had preferred an appeal before the Tribunal challenging, inter alia, the addition made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The Revenue had also preferred an appeal, inter alia, on the ground that no transfer pricing adjustment had been made on account of interest on outstanding receivables from the Associated Enterprises. In the first round of proceedings, the Tribunal restored both the issues to the file of the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication. In the second round of proceedings, the assessee filed revised computation of income declaring total income of Rs.15,41,65,494/-. Further, the TPO determined a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 53,06,005/- towards notional interest on outstanding trade receivables by adopting the short-term deposit rate of State Bank of India. Pursuant thereto, the Assessing Officer passed t…

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether a separate transfer pricing adjustment towards notional interest on outstanding trade receivables is warranted in the case of the assessee, which claims to be a debt-free company.
  • 2. Whether the assessee was completely debt-free during the relevant previous year.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1•Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning