Late Shri Duleechanda Vs. The I.T.O
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The case pertains to an appeal by the assessee, Late Shri Duleechanda, against the order of the NFAC, Delhi dated 04.12.2024 for A.Y 2010-11. The assessee filed an application for condonation of delay due to ill health, which was accepted by the Tribunal. The assessee raised several grounds challenging the reassessment order dated 18.12.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under sections 144 and 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO had imposed an addition of Rs. 1,08,00,000/- in the case of Shri Duleechanda and Shri Dharmender Chaudhary, treating them as an Association of Persons (AOP). However, the case was initially reopened under the status of an individual.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the reassessment order imposing an addition of Rs. 1,08,00,000/- is arbitrary and bad in law.
- 2. Whether the AO lacked the requisite statutory jurisdiction under Section 120 r.w.s 124 of the Act.
- 3. Whether the reasons to believe recorded by a non-jurisdictional AO suffers from an incurable defect.
- 4. Whether the CIT(A) erred in setting aside the impugned proceedings to the AO, who lacks jurisdiction over the case.
- 5. Whether the approval granted by the competent authority u/s 151 of the Act is mechanical in nature.
- 6. Whether the 'reasons to believe' is vague, arbitrary, and based upon borrowed satisfaction.
1 further legal issue analysed in the full judgement.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
4 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Shri Anbazhagan Elango Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kancheepuram
Shri Prakasam Krishnamoorthy Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Trichy
Urveen Shivprasad Vyas Vs. The DCIT, Cir.2(1)(1) Ahmedabad
Ahmedabad benchSmt. Manackchand Aarthi Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kancheepuram
Bapa Bajrangdas Recidanciy Velfer Association vs. Income Tax Officer
Ahmedabad benchR. Viswanathan v. The DCIT, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai