Lalabhai Gohel vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Lalabhai Gohel, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirming the addition of Rs.28,38,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of the sale of immovable property. The assessee claimed that the land in question was agricultural land and that he was unaware of the complexities of Income Tax Procedures. The assessee's counsel argued that the orders of the lower authorities were ex parte and requested an opportunity for the assessee to present his case. The respondent relied on the findings of the lower authorities.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Confirmation of addition made by the Assessing Officer
• 2. Opportunity for the assessee to present his case

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Hasmukhbhai Vekariya vs. ITO

  Ahmedabad bench

• Chimanlal Kathiriya vs. ACIT

  Ahmedabad bench

• Sanmati Packaging Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Lickmichand Anand Singhvi vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Chennai bench

• Sh. Dushyant Raj Chikara Vs. CIT(A)/NFAC

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2016-17Allowed

• Ms. Zeba Urfi Vs Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2013-14Allowed