Kondi Venkat Reddy Vs. Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Kondi Venkat Reddy, along with three others, purchased land in Boduppal village for Rs.7,45,00,000/- and sold it at a profit of Rs.2,62,00,000/-. The assessee did not disclose this transaction in his income return. The Assessing Officer issued notices under the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the assessee did not comply. Consequently, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under sections 144 and 147 of the Act, making additions of Rs.1,86,25,000/- and Rs.87,50,000/-. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who upheld the Assessing Officer's order. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, claiming he was only a name lender and not an actual beneficiary of the land transaction.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the source of payments made towards the purchase of the impugned land and the actual beneficiaries of the sale proceeds have been verified by the revenue authorities.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Nataraj Ramaiah v. Income Tax Officer, International Taxation

  Chennai bench

• Amancherla Venkata Prabhakar Rao Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Hyderabad bench

• DCIT, Circle 52(1), New Delhi vs. Bhupinder Singh Bhalla

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2016-17Allowed

• Sarang Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. Vs. I.T.O., Ward-4(3), Kolkata

  Kolkata ‘D’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2015-16Partly Allowed

• Adel Saini vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Faridabad, Haryana

• ITA No.1393/Del/2018

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2009-10Dismissed