Kiran Gupta Vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Kiran Gupta, filed an original return for the Assessment Year 2011-12 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,97,470/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) re-opened the assessee's assessment based on information from a search conducted on the Chetak Group of Nimbahera. The AO made two additions to the assessee's income: Rs. 25,61,500/- for an unsecured loan given to M/s U.B. Investment and Rs. 1,00,000/- for an unsecured loan given to M/s Uday Bheru Lal Anjana. The assessee appealed against the AO's order, arguing that the re-assessment was based on incorrect reasons and that the loans were given in an earlier year. The Tribunal found that the AO's reasons for re-assessment were incorrect and that the re-assessment was not sustainable.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Validity of the re-assessment proceedings by the AO
• 2. Merits of the additions made by the AO

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Quetzal Buildtech Private Limited vs. ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2016-17Partly Allowed

• Late M.L. Krupal vs. ITO

  C’’BENCH: BANGALORE benchAY 2005-06Partly Allowed

• DCIT, Central Circle 2, vs. Vee Gee Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

  Delhi Bench 'F', New Delhi benchAY 2016-17Dismissed

• Manoj Saboo vs ITO

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12Partly Allowed

• Gyan Prakash Gupta Vs. I.T.O., Ward-43(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata ‘C’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2018-19Partly Allowed

• M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2011-12Allowed