Skip to main content

M/s. KH Facility Solutions India Private Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Case No: ITA No.201/Hyd/2022
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'B' Bench
Date: 9/9/2024

Parties Involved

appellantM/s. KH Facility Solutions India Private Limited
respondentDy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Facts Summary

The assessee company filed its return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 30.11.2017 declaring a loss of Rs. 38,71,38,819/-. The case was selected for scrutiny due to international transactions. The Assessing Officer referred the case to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the international transaction. The TPO computed the ALP after making certain adjustments. The assessee filed objections before the Learned Dispute Resolution Panel (Ld. DRP) and partly succeeded. The assessee then filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. The order of the Assessing Officer is bad in law and liable to be set aside.
  • 2. The Assessing Officer erred in making an upward transfer pricing adjustment of INR 9,05,670 by treating the ALP of the international transaction involving receipt of technical services as Nil.
  • 3. The Assessing Officer erred in making an upward transfer pricing adjustment of INR 1,27,31,520 by treating the ALP of the international transaction involving receipt of regional support services as Nil.
  • 4. The Assessing Officer erred by treating the outstanding receivables from its Associated Enterprises as separate international transaction.
  • 5. The Assessing Officer erred by not considering the fact that the Assessee does not charge interest from its non-AE customers for delay in realisation of invoices.
  • 6. The Assessing Officer erred by adopting SBI's short-term deposit interest rates for computation of notional interest on outstanding receivables denominated in foreign currencies.

4 further legal issues analysed in the full judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

6 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning