Skip to main content

KGR Enterprises Pvt Ltd and Others vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Case No: ITA Nos.1584/Mum/2024, 1585/Mum/2024, 1586/Mum/2024, 1587/Mum/2024, 1588/Mum/2024, 1589/Mum/2024, 1590/Mum/2024, 1591/Mum/2024, 1592/Mum/2024, 1593/Mum/2024, 2389/Mum/2024, 2390/Mum/2024, 2392/Mum/2024, 2395/Mum/2024, 2399/Mum/2024, 2401/Mum/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Date: 26 Sept 2024

Parties Involved

appellantKGR Enterprises Pvt Ltd
respondentDeputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle 6(1), Mumbai

Facts Summary

The case involves multiple appeals filed by KGR Enterprises Pvt Ltd and Mr. Kailash Prakash Karamchandani against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax. The appeals were filed against the assessment orders passed under section 153A and 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee and the revenue have raised various grounds of appeal, primarily challenging the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to issue notices under sections 153A and 153C, the validity of the assessment proceedings, and the correctness of the additions made to the income. The search and seizure action at the premises of KGR Enterprises Pvt Ltd revealed circular trading transactions without actual movement or delivery of goods. The Assessing Officer added back the expenses at 3% of the circular trading turnover, which was later reduced to 1% by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The assessee challenged the jurisdictional validity of the notices issued under sections 153A and 153C, arguing that there was no incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal considered the submissions and held that the incriminating material must be found during the course of the search conducted on the concerned assessee. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee and dismissed the appeals of the revenue.

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Jurisdictional validity of notices under sections 153A and 153C
  • 2. Correctness of additions made to the income

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

4 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning