Skip to main content

Kesaram Chatararamji Coudhary Vs. ITO Ward 28(2)(1)

Case No: ITA No. 6556/MUM/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench
Date: 1/23/2026

Parties Involved

AppellantKesaram Chatararamji Coudhary
RespondentITO Ward 28(2)(1)

Facts Summary

The assessee, Kesaram Chatararamji Coudhary, is engaged in the business of running a general store. For the assessment year 2017-18, the assessee did not file any return of income. The Assessing Officer noticed cash deposits in the bank accounts of the assessee during the demonetisation period and issued notices under sections 142(1) and 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee failed to comply with these notices, leading the Assessing Officer to treat the cash deposits as unexplained incom

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the Assessing Officer erred in adding the sum of Rs. 26,51,401/- as unexplained money income under section 69A of the Act.

Precedents Relied Upon

4 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning