Skip to main content

KARUPPANNA GOUNDER PARAMASIVAM v. DCIT, CIRLE 1, ERODE

Case No: ITA No 3363/Chny/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Date: 1/27/2026

Parties Involved

appellantKARUPPANNA GOUNDER PARAMASIVAM
respondentDCIT, CIRLE 1, ERODE

Facts Summary

The Assessee, KARUPPANNA GOUNDER PARAMASIVAM, filed the return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 on 10.03.2018 declaring a total income of Rs. NIL. During the year, the Assessee had declared income from Profit and Gains from business and profession and income from other sources. The Assessment Order was passed under section 143(3) dated 23.12.2019, making an addition of Rs. 92,36,863.00 under section 69(A) as unexplained money. The Assessee challenged this order before the Commissioner o

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned?

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
KARUPPANNA GOUNDER PARAMASIVAM v. DCIT, CIRLE 1, ERODE - Opakhya | Opakhya