Skip to main content

Kanaka Raju Uppalapati vs. ITO, Ward-13(1)

Case No: ITA Nos.1366 & 1367/HYD/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad
Date: 9/9/2026

Parties Involved

appellantKanaka Raju Uppalapati
respondentITO, Ward-13(1), O/O ITO, Ward-13(1), Aayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad-500004, Telangana

Facts Summary

The assessee, Kanaka Raju Uppalapati, is an individual employed with Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), a Public Sector Undertaking under the administrative control of the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India. BSNL introduced the Voluntary Retirement Scheme – 2019 for its employees aged 50 years and above, on payment of retirement ex-gratia. The assessee opted for the scheme and received compensation/ex-gratia, which was taxed by BSNL after deducting applicable TDS as per law. The assessee filed appeals before the respective Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, claiming exemption under section 10(10B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the compensation received from BSNL under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme – 2019.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned?
  • 2. Whether the compensation received from BSNL under the VRS-2019 is eligible for exemption under section 10(10B) of the Act?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

6 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Kanaka Raju Uppalapati vs. ITO, Ward-13(1) | ITA Nos.1366 & 1367/HYD/2026 | 2026 | Opakhya