Kamla Devi, W/o Parma Nand vs The ITO, Dharamshala

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Kamla Devi, was engaged in business and had disclosed total sales of Rs.2,62,71,740/- and net profit of Rs.7,91,974/-, giving a net profit rate of about 3%. The Assessing Officer observed that various expenses claimed by the assessee were not properly substantiated and that quantitative details of closing stock were not furnished. The Assessing Officer, therefore, rejected the books of account under section 145(3) of the Act and estimated the business profit at 8% of the total turnover, resulting in an estimated profit of Rs.21,01,740/-. After allowing credit for the profit of Rs.7,91,974/- declared by the assessee, an addition of Rs.13,09,766/- was made. The Assessing Officer further made an addition of Rs.1,35,800/- under section 69A of the Act in respect of cash deposited in the assessee's bank account, holding that the assessee had failed to explain the nature and source thereof. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed both the additions and dismissed the appeal of the assessee.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the estimation of profit at 8% of turnover was excessive and unreasonable?
• 2. Whether the cash deposits in the bank account should be treated as unexplained income under section 69A?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Meenakshisundaram Balamurugan Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Dindigul

• Income Tax Officer Vs. Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal

  Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi benchAY 2021-22Dismissed

• Kasturi Medical Centre Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, NFAC, Delhi

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Boogie Woogie Computer Centre

  SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2017-2018Allowed

• Shri Moorthy Ramasubramanian v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1, Tirunelveli

• Gurpreet Kaur Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(6), Civic Centre, New Delhi-110001