KAMAL SINGH VS. ACIT CIRCLE-14(1)
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Kamal Singh, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. NFAC, Delhi dated 26.09.2023, relating to assessment year 2012-13. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issue of notice for hearing. The assessee claimed that the Ld. CIT(A) passed an exparte order without proper hearing or service of notice. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of non-prosecution, without deciding on the merits of the case.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) passed an exparte order without proper hearing/service of notice upon the assessee.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
JAN MOHAMMAD, DATAWALI MAWANA, MEERUT UTTAR PRADESH-25004 (PAN: FBRPM4115B) VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), MEERUT, UP
Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12AllowedDHIR SINGH VS. ITO, WARD 1(4)
DELHI BENCH benchAY 2017-18AllowedBHOOP SINGH VS. ITO, WARD-1, VILLAGE PAULI, JULANA, JIND, HARYANA
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedPAWAN KUMAR VS. ITO, WARD-2(1)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12AllowedSURENDER VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4, SONIPT, HARYANA
DELHI BENCH benchAY 2012-13AllowedSTAR LIFESTYLES PVT. LTD. VS. ITO, WARD 24(1)
DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI benchAY 2011-12Allowed