Kailash Baburao Suryawanshi Vs. The Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Kailash Baburao Suryawanshi, is an individual who was running a car rental business during the relevant period. For the assessment year 2018-19, the assessee did not file any return of income. The case was taken up for scrutiny under section 147 of the Act. Despite multiple opportunities given to the assessee, no one appeared on his behalf, leading the Assessing Officer (AO) to frame the assessment under section 144 of the Act. The AO made several additions to the assessee's income, including additions on account of the sale of a motor vehicle, payments made for a credit card, contract payments received, and rent of plant & machinery. Aggrieved by the AO's order, the assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), but the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The assessee then approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, claiming that his employees had committed fraud, leading to the additions in his income.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal
• 2. Validity of the additions made by the AO

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Krishna Gopal Saraf Vs. The A.C.I.T

  Delhi ‘C’ Bench benchAY 2013-14, 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Manackraj Kamaraj VS ITO NCW 11(2) Chennai

• Hargovind Motibhai Desai Vs. The Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• Vijaysingh Manusingh Rathore vs. The ITO, Ward-2(1)(1) Ahmedabad

  Ahmedabad bench

• Gurpreet Singh Dhillon Vs DCIT

• Dhairya Jyotish Dandwala vs The ITO, Ward-5(2)(2), Ahmedabad

  Ahmedabad bench