Skip to main content

Jitendra Vallabhdas Sanghavi vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Case No: ITA No. 2793/MUM/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date: 9/24/2024

Parties Involved

appellantJitendra Vallabhdas Sanghavi
respondentCommissioner of Income Tax

Facts Summary

Jitendra Vallabhdas Sanghavi filed his return of income on 31.10.2017 reporting total income at Rs.830/-. The Assessing Officer noted a disallowance of interest attributable to a loan advance to M/s. Krypton Investment Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. amounting to Rs.1,11,00,000/- in the assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) for Assessment Year 2014-15. Similar facts existed in the impugned year i.e., Assessment Year 2017-18, and a show cause notice was issued. The assessee made a detailed submission on the e-Assessment portal, which the Assessing Officer acknowledged but did not accept. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), but the appeal was dismissed ex parte due to non-compliance. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the Hon'ble ADDL/JCIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in passing the order under section 143(3) merely on the basis of borrowed satisfaction, presumption, and surmises?
  • 2. Whether the Hon'ble ADDL/JCIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance made by Assessing Officer under section 57(iii) amounting to Rs.1,11,00,000/- without considering the facts of the case?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning