Jimmy George vs. The Income Tax Officer
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Jimmy George, filed his Income Tax return along with the audit report belatedly on 29/03/2016 for the assessment year 2015-16. The Assessing Officer levied a penalty under section 271B of the Act for the delay in filing the audit report. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the penalty. The assessee appealed against this order, arguing that the audit report was furnished before the completion of the assessment, which was on 30/06/2017. The assessee cited a previous order of the Cochin Tribunal in the case of Shri T.T Kuruvilla (ITA No. 504/Coch/2018) to support his contention that no penalty should be imposed if the audit report is furnished before the completion of the assessment.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer under section 271B of the Act for non-furnishing of the tax audit report within the due date was rightly confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
3 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
GC Vidyadevi Vs. The Income Tax Officer
Cochin benchParayakad Service Co-operative Bank Limited v. The Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-1 Alappuzha
Cochin benchM/s. Palliyakkal Service Co-op Bank Ltd. vs. The Income Tax Officer
Cochin benchAdat Farmers Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer - 2(1)
Cochin benchMahadev Stone Works vs. ITO Ward-3(3)
Varanasi benchUshashree Kunjulekshmi Amma Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Cochin bench