Skip to main content

Jayshree Ravi Sancheti vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 27(1), Mumbai

Case No: ITA No.5998/Mum/2026 & 6640/Mum/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'F' Bench, Mumbai
Date: 9/10/2026

Parties Involved

appellantJayshree Ravi Sancheti
respondentDy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 27(1), Mumbai

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jayshree Ravi Sancheti, filed appeals against two separate reassessment orders passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16. The reassessments were initiated based on notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee filed objections against the reasons for reopening, but the Assessing Officer did not dispose of these objections by passing separate speaking orders before proceeding with the reassessments. The jurisdictional issue before the tribunal was whether the failure to dispose of the objections by separate speaking orders before reassessments constituted a jurisdictional infirmity.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the failure to dispose of objections by separate speaking orders before reassessments constitutes a jurisdictional infirmity.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

6 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning