Jayeshbhai Maheshchandra Gor Vs ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jayeshbhai Maheshchandra Gor, appealed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, which confirmed the addition of Rs. 16,29,620/- as agriculture income from the sale of cotton and Rs. 11,64,680/- under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act as differential value of stamp duty and purchase price of agricultural lands. The assessee claimed agriculture income of Rs. 18,25,745/- from the sale of cotton and vegetables but failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claims due to lack of evidence. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the addition of income except for the sale of vegetables, which was partially allowed. The assessee appealed this decision to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 16,29,620/- as agriculture income from sale of cotton.
• 2. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 11,64,680/- under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act as differential value of stamp duty and purchase price of agricultural lands.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Zahida Bano Mohammad Yusuf Shaikh v/s Income Tax Officer, Ward-41(4)(4)

• Naresh Kumar Morya Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Ragini Bhadauria v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-49(1), New Delhi-110001

  Delhi Bench ‘SMC’, New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Tillsoil Farms Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT

  Delhi bench

• Raghvendra Singh

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-2019Allowed

• Jaydip Dhar vs. Income Tax Officer

  SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2016-17Allowed