Skip to main content

Jayam Enterprises vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Salem

Case No: ITA No.3123/Chny/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘A’ Bench: Chennai
Date: 1/28/2026

Parties Involved

appellantJayam Enterprises
respondentThe Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Salem

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jayam Enterprises, a partnership firm, did not file the return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information that the assessee had deposited a sum of Rs. 1,90,29,000/- in cash into the bank account and had withdrawn cash to the tune of Rs. 7,50,000/-. Consequently, the AO issued a notice under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and subsequently passed an order under section 148A(d) of the Act on 25.04.2022. The AO completed the ass

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of notice under section 148 of the Act issued after expiry of three years with the approval of PCIT instead of PCCIT.

Precedents Relied Upon

4 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning