Jasvinder Kaur W/o Jarnail Singh v. The ITO Nabha
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Jasvinder Kaur, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/First Appellate Commissioner, Delhi, dated 27/02/2024, pertaining to the Assessment Year 2013-14. The assessee had purchased agricultural land, and the source of the income was questioned. Despite multiple opportunities, the assessee did not provide bank details or respond adequately. The assessee claimed that the source of the money was from her husband, Jarnail Singh, but no bank account statements were provided. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal, and the assessee further appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to pass a fresh order on the merits of the case.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the source of income for the purchase of agricultural land was properly examined by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Similar Judgements
Mohammad Ebrahim Rahim vs. Income Tax Officer-26(2)(3)
Mumbai benchSmt. Bimla Kaur Multani vs. ITO, Ward Dasuya
Amritsar benchMrs. Vinodhini vs. ACIT
Chennai benchIslampur C.S. Shop 2
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-2018AllowedM/s. Guptajee & Company vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench ‘F’ benchAY 2011-12DismissedMohan Bhaguji Nanaware vs. Ward 1(1), Kalyan
Mumbai bench