Jaspal Singh and Sons HUF Vs. ITO, Ward 50(3)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jaspal Singh and Sons HUF, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2009-10 declaring nil income. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the act. Subsequently, based on information from the investigation wing of Ahmedabad, the assessing officer reopened the assessment proceedings under section 147 of the act. The assessee again filed a return declaring nil income. The investigation revealed that the assessee had shifted profits into losses by modifying client codes in securities transactions, resulting in a reduction of income by Rs 3,77,81,031/-. The assessing officer made an addition of this amount, which was challenged by the assessee before the Learned First Appellate Authority and later before the Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Jurisdictional sufficiency of reassessment proceedings under section 147
• 2. Validity of addition under section 69
• 3. Consideration of financial statements by lower authorities
• 4. Opportunity to be heard and procedural fairness

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• SH. MUKESH SINGLA & SONS (HUF), VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 28(1)

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Landis +Gyr Limited Vs. DCIT, Cir.1(1)

  Kolkata benchAY 2022-23Allowed

• Sungroup Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle 24 (2)

• Anand Prakash Gupta Vs ACIT, Circle-46(1), New Delhi

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2010-11Allowed

• Ambika Tradelink (P) Ltd. vs. ITO, Wd-4(3), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2009-10Allowed

• M/s R.S. Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Circle 11(3)

  D Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2016-17Allowed