Jarnalbeer Singh Bhatia vs. DCIT/ACIT, (Central)-3, Indore
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
Jarnalbeer Singh Bhatia, engaged in goods handling and transportation services through 'M/s Bhatia Transport Services', was subjected to a search under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The search led to assessments for assessment years 2013-14 to 2018-19. The assessee and the revenue both appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal. The assessee contested the notional additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3 (CIT(A)), while the revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decisions on various grounds, including the acceptance of additional evidence and the deletion of certain additions.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Unexplained investment in the form of cash loans and notional interest thereon u/s 69
- 2. Unexplained investment in jewellery u/s 69
- 3. Unexplained money in lockers u/s 69A
- 4. Admission of additional evidences by CIT(A)
- 5. Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 from M/s Vedic Commotrade Pvt. Ltd.
- 6. Disallowance of freight expenses u/s 40(a)(ia)
4 further legal issues analysed in the full judgement.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Nevin H. Bharwani v/s Income Tax Officer (International Taxation)
Savera Commotrade Private Limited Vs. ITO
Mrs. Charanjit Kaur Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-69(1), New Delhi
ITA No. 3415/Mum/2025 & CO No. 268/Mum/2025 (A.Y. 2014-15)
ITA No.4209/Del/2024 Jalco Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.(AY: 2017-18)
"C" BENCH, DELHI benchAY 2017-18DismissedSmt. Bimla Kaur Multani vs. ITO, Ward Dasuya
Amritsar bench