Jain Pravin Hiralal HUF vs. ITO, Ward-6(1), Pune

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jain Pravin Hiralal HUF, filed an appeal against the order passed by the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-6, Delhi for the assessment year 2020-21. The assessee contested the adjustments made by the CPC under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, particularly the set-off of business loss against long-term capital gains and interest income. The assessee argued that the CPC erred in making these adjustments without prior intimation and in not following judicial precedents. The assessee also pointed out computational errors in the CPC's intimation. The Tribunal found some merit in the assessee's arguments and decided to set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for re-computation of the total income and tax liability.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the adjustment made by CPC under Section 143(1) is justified in law and on facts.
• 2. Whether the CPC erred in not setting off brought forward capital loss against LTCG.
• 3. Whether the CPC made adjustments without prior intimation as required under Section 143(1)(a).
• 4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the grounds without considering judicial precedents.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Agilent Technologies (International) P. Ltd. vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), Gurgaon

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• ITA No.1130/Kol/2025

• Federation of Rajasthan Trade & Industry v. ITO-Exemption

  Jaipur bench

• Paramanand and Sons Vs. The Income Tax Officer

  ‘A’ Bench, Bangalore benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Parekh Marketing Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

  Mumbai Bench 'C' benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Sikha Rani De Vs. I.T.O., Ward-3(1), Bankura

  Kolkata 'SMC' Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed