Skip to main content

Jagannath Sambhaji Satav vs. Income Tax Officer

Case No: ITA No.607/PUN/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune
Date: 9/24/2024

Parties Involved

appellantJagannath Sambhaji Satav
respondentIncome Tax Officer

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jagannath Sambhaji Satav, is an individual deriving income from 'income from other sources'. The assessee did not file regular income tax returns as per the provisions of section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the assessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2014-15, it was noted that the assessee had surrendered his tenancy rights of land for a total consideration of Rs.5,25,00,000/- and received Rs.2,59,24,250/- towards his share. Statutory notices under sections 148 and 142(1)/143(2) were issued, to which the assessee did not respond. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, adding Rs.2,59,24,250/- as long-term capital gain. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal, finding the assessee non-cooperative. The assessee further appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissing the appeal is illegal and against the principles of natural justice?
  • 2. Whether the addition of Rs.2,59,24,250/- as long-term capital gain is justified?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning