Munish Kumar Verma Vs. The I.T.O

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Munish Kumar Verma, is an individual engaged in share trading and investing activities. He filed his Return of Income on 29.09.2012 declaring NIL income and claimed Rs 82,21,809/- as loss. The return was selected for scrutiny assessment, and statutory notices were issued. The Assessing Officer noticed unsecured loans amounting to Rs. 4,62,06,941/- in the assessee's Balance Sheet. The assessee failed to provide complete evidence regarding these loans, leading the AO to conclude that a major part of the loans were non-genuine. Consequently, the AO added Rs. 3,19,32,924/- to the assessee's income and Rs 2,13,827/- on account of low withdrawal. Aggrieved by this, the assessee appealed to the CIT(A), who partly allowed the appeal by confirming an addition of Rs. 95,00,516/- and restricting the low withdrawal addition to Rs. 1,00,000/-.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 95,00,516/- on account of fresh unsecured loan.
• 2. Restriction of addition of Rs. 2,13,827/- to Rs. 1,00,000/- on account of low withdrawal.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• M/s Morpheus Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 17(2) Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Income Tax Officer-20(2)(1) vs. NDW Development Corporation LLP

  Mumbai "B" Bench benchAY 2022-23Dismissed

• Lime Fresh Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. I.T.O., Ward - 3(1)

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2012-13Allowed

• Income Tax Officer, Ward -7(1) Vs. RJC Developers Pvt. Ltd.

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2012-13Dismissed

• ITA No. 6087/DEL/2016 [A.Y 2012-13] ITA No. 6089/DEL/2016 [A.Y 2014-15] The A. C.I.T Vs. M/s Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Ltd

• Asis Sarkar Vs. ITO, Ward-50(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata 'SMC' Bench benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed