ITA No.5803/DEL/2013 Atul Sharma vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Atul Sharma, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 05.08.2013, which upheld the order of the Assessing Officer dated 26.12.2012. The assessee received compensation from DLF Commercial Complexes Ltd. for non-delivery of a property. The assessee treated this compensation as capital receipt, but the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) treated it as interest income. The assessee also claimed deductions for interest paid on bank loans linked to the acquisition of property at DLF Tower, Shivagi Marg, New Delhi.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the compensation received by the assessee from DLF for non-delivery of property in time could be construed as capital receipt not chargeable to income-tax?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Smt. Urmila Dhelia v/s Income Tax Officer

  Mumbai benchAY 2011-12Partly Allowed

• Sh. Deepak Kumar Yadav Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Rewari, Haryana

• Dilbag Singh vs Income Tax Officer, Rohtak

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Dimple Bhatia Batta vs. National Faceless Appeals Centre

  Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Sh. Daulat Ram vs. Income Tax Officer, Rewari (JAO)

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Mr. Subhash Suryakant Phadkar Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2011-12Allowed