ITA No.5566/Mum/2025
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The instant appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2007-08. The impugned order emanated from the order of the Income-tax Officer, Ward 19(3)(4), Mumbai, passed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. During the assessment year, an addition of Rs.1,35,719/- was confirmed, being 6% on the bogus purchases of Rs.22,61,986/-. The Ld. AO levied a penalty of Rs.41,940/- being 100% of the tax sought to be evaded for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who deleted the penalty relying on a previous ITAT order.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the penalty levied on estimated additions is sustainable in law?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
DY. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2011-12DismissedShree Krishna Vanaspati Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-23(3), New Delhi
Delhi Bench ‘G’ benchAY 2012-13AllowedC & S Electric Limited vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre
Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2015-16AllowedRam Garhia Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-63(1), New Delhi
Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2014-15AllowedSuresh Chand v. ITO Ward 4(1)
Delhi Bench ‘G’, New Delhi benchAY 2014-15AllowedJayco Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-13(3), Delhi
Delhi Bench benchAY 2007-08Allowed