ITA No.508/Ahd/2020
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee filed return of income on 12.07.2012 declaring total income of Rs.10,33,470/-. The case was reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after duly recording the reasons and due sanction of PCIT. Accordingly, notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued on 22.03.2019 and duly served upon the assessee. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee traded in the scrip of Gemstone Investment Limited and claimed Long Term Capital Gain of Rs.6,76,623/- during the Financial Year 2011-12 relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee has not given the details and, therefore, the Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.6,76,623/- as unexplained money. The assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Deletion of disallowance of Rs.6,76,623/- made under Section 10(38) of the Act
- 2. Deletion of addition of Rs.6,76,623/- as unexplained money
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Kiran Agarwal vs. ITO, Ward -28(4), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2015-16AllowedBhakti Kishor Gada Vs ITO
Pune benchArvind Bhaguji Kangane Vs DCIT, Circle – 27(1), Mumbai
Mumbai benchAY 2016-2017AllowedVikas Nahata
SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2011-2012AllowedShamji Ramji Chauhan Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Ahmedabad benchBhavika Bhuwalka Vs. ITO
Delhi Bench benchAY 2013-14Allowed