ITA No.3367/Ahd/2014

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd., filed its return of fringe benefits for the Assessment Year 2007-08, declaring a total value of fringe benefits at Nil. However, the tax audit report reported the value of fringe benefits at Rs.2,78,55,648/-. Upon noticing that fringe benefits chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, the Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment under section 115WG and completed the reassessment under section 115WE(3) read with section 115WG, determining the value of fringe benefits at Rs.3,68,94,408/-. This included an addition of Rs.90,38,760/- for expenses related to 'use of health club and similar facilities,' which were assessed at 50% instead of the 20% claimed by the assessee. The assessee filed an appeal against the AO’s order, contending that the expenses of Rs.3,01,29,201/- were incorrectly classified as 'use of health club and similar facilities' and were instead related to guest house maintenance, security guard salaries, gardening, and cleaning expenses. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) called for the Remand Report from the AO. The CIT(A), after considering the submissions and remand report, found that the AO had failed to establish that these expenses were for health club facilities. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee’s claim that the correct valuation rate was 20%, not 50%, and directed the AO to reassess the fringe benefits accordingly.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the expenses were genuinely incurred for health club and similar facilities or were related to other activities, as claimed by the assessee.
• 2. Whether the CIT(A) correctly directed the AO to value the fringe benefits @ 20%.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Revenue.

Similar Judgements

• Apar Lubricant Ltd. vs. DCIT 14(1)(1), Mumbai

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2009-10Allowed

• Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited vs. Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2015-16Partly Allowed

• DCIT, Central Circle-20, New Delhi-110055 Vs Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd.

• Veedol Corporation Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle 4(1)

• Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs Jagson International Ltd. & Jagson International Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Partly Allowed

• Trustworthy Security Services Pvt. Ltd.