ITA No. 253/CHD/2024
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, M.R.S. Shri Prannath Parnami Education Society, has appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 14.01.2024, for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee has challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,35,42,110/- made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) by treating the amount shown to be received as corpus donation as voluntary donation received during the FY 2016-17 relevant to AY 2017-18. Additionally, the assessee has contested the genuineness of unsecured loans amounting to Rs. 42,00,000/- during the FY 2016-17 relevant to AY 2017-18. The A.O. had issued notices under section 133(6) of the Act to 8 donors out of 285, but only one response was received and found unacceptable. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the addition and the appeal was heard on 19.09.2024.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,35,42,110/- made by the A.O. by treating the amount shown to be received as corpus donation as voluntary donation received during the FY 2016-17 relevant to AY 2017-18.
- 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in genuineness of unsecured loan amounting to Rs. 42,00,000/- during the FY 2016-17 relevant to AY 2017-18.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
7 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Chander Bhan Yogesh Kumar Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-10
Delhi Bench 'C', Delhi benchAY 2018-19AllowedChittipolu Srinivas vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1, Nalgonda
Hyderabad benchTirupati Timbers & Packaging Pvt. Limited
SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2011-2012AllowedGayatriAnand Education Society Vs. ITO
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedHemant Kumar, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kasturi Jewellers P. Ltd.
Delhi Bench 'F' benchAY 2017-18DismissedJalpaiguri Zilla Regulated Market Committee Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Jalpaiguri