ITA No.1928/Chny/2024

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assesse, Jagadeesan Ramkumar, has filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] on 29.05.2024. The assesse challenged the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act. The assesse submitted that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not consider the evidence provided by the assesse during the assessment proceedings. The appeal was heard on 24.09.2024, and the judgment was pronounced on 27.09.2024.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Assessing Officer overlooked the evidence provided by the assesse?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• ITA No.1893/Chny/2024

  Chennai bench

• Mrs. Shivajyothi vs. The Income Tax Officer

  Chennai bench

• Sagar Jain vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Dismissed

• Shreeji Developers vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)

  Ahmedabad bench

• Karakulam Service Co-operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer

  Cochin bench

• Hindustan EPC Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT

  Delhi bench