ITA No 132 of 2024 Chundi Sukumar Reddy
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, a non-resident individual, did not file an income return for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The Income Tax Officer issued a notice under section 148 on 28/03/2021, leading to the reopening of the assessment. The Assessing Officer passed an order under section 144C(1) on 01/03/2023, adding Rs.34,21,060/- towards Long-Term Capital Gain. The assessee filed an objection against the draft assessment order before the DRP-1 Bengaluru, which was rejected. The assessee then appealed to the Tribunal against the final assessment order.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the draft assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer is beyond limitation?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
3 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
BBC World Service India Pvt. Ltd Vs. ACIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedEmmsons International Ltd. vs DCIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18DismissedAdidas India Marketing Private Limited vs. Asst. CIT
MSD Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT
Naraindas Essardas and Sons (HK) Limited vs. ACIT(IT)
Mumbai benchComparex India P. Ltd. vs. ITO, Circle 4 (2), New Delhi
Delhi bench