ITA 4528/DEL/2026

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Jyoti Rani, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessee argued that the final addition in the assessment order was made on an issue other than for which the assessment was reopened. The assessment was reopened on the ground that the assessee had received commission from Future Maker Life Care Pvt. Ltd. under a Ponzi Scheme. However, the Assessing Officer accepted that no commission was received but made an addition for wrongly claimed expenses. The assessee contended that the Assessing Officer could not make such an addition as it was not part of the reasons for reopening the assessment. The department defended the order and the legality of the assessment. The limited issue for consideration was the validity of reopening the assessment. The Tribunal found that the addition was made on a ground other than for which the assessment was reopened and quashed the assessment order.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Validity of reopening of assessment
• 2. Legality of the assessment made under section 148 of the Act

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Shri Abhimanyu Nath Vs. The I.T.O

  Delhi 'C' Bench benchAY 2012-13Dismissed

• Horizon Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT

• Bholenath Foods Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2012-13Remanded

• Aahan Trading Company v. ITO

  Rajkot bench

• Agarwal Finestate Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), New Delhi-110002

• Shri Sushil Kumar Jain vs. The ITO, Ward 7(2), Jaipur

  Jaipur bench