ITA 384/JODH/2024
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, a resident corporate entity, filed its return of income on 29.10.2017, declaring income of Rs.31,59,670/-. The return was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had deposited specified Bank Notes (SBNs) in its bank accounts during the demonetization period, amounting to Rs.66,97,000/-. The assessee claimed that the cash deposited was from sales proceeds during the demonetization period. However, the Assessing Officer was not convinced and treated the amount as unexplained money, adding it to the assessee's income. The assessee contested this addition by filing an appeal before the First Appellate Authority, which confirmed the addition to the extent of Rs. 46,97,000/-. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. The addition of an amount of Rs.46,97,000/- under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Rangasamy Vimala vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai benchShakti Sales Corporation Vs ITO, Ward-27(3)(1), Mumbai
Sridharpur Co-Operative Bank Vs. ITO, Ward-3(2), Burdwan
Kolkata ‘C’ Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedTamilNadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai benchRajesh Kumar Dalmia Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly AllowedShri Pandian Hari Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 11(4), Chennai