Skip to main content

Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(1), R. No.380 C, Third Floor, CR Building, ITO, Delhi 110002 Vs. Continental Construction Ltd., 28, Continental House, Nehru Place, Delhi 110019

Case No: आअसं.3211/धिल्ली /2025(नि.व. 2010-11)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench
Bench: Delhi Bench
Date: 2/4/2026

Parties Involved

appellantIncome Tax Officer, Ward-6(1), R. No.380 C, Third Floor, CR Building, ITO, Delhi 110002
respondentContinental Construction Ltd., 28, Continental House, Nehru Place, Delhi 110019

Facts Summary

The assessee company was engaged in the business of civil contracting and was also a partner in a joint venture under the name and style of M/s Continental Foundation Joint Venture. The assessee was primarily executing civil construction projects in Iraq and Libya since 1976. Consequent to Gulf War, the situation in Iraq deteriorated significantly, resulting in substantial losses to the assessee, as no amounts were received in respect of the projects executed for the Government of Iraq. The assessee had taken a comprehensive insurance cover under “Construction Works Policy” (CWP) covering all risks and ensuring payment of contractual dues. The said policy was issued by the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation Ltd. (ECGC), a body set up by the Government of India under the Ministry of Commerce. As per the terms of CWP, delay in payment of contractual dues beyond 120 days by Iraq was required to be indemnified by ECGC. Consequent to default by Iraq, the assessee along with other Indian contractors operating in Iraq approached ECGC for settlement of their claims. Considering magnitude of the claims and quantum of dues recoverable from the Government of Iraq, ECGC found it difficult to honour its commitments due to inadequacy of financial resources. Thereafter, a Deferred Payment Agreement (DPA) was entered into between the Government of India and the Government of Iraq, whereby foreign currency dues were deferred and were payable in instalments with effect from 01.01.1983, in the

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Allowability of assessee’s claim of bad debts written off.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning