Income Tax Officer, Ward 38(1), Midnapur, Paschim Medinipur-721101, West Bengal Vs. Kurkutbandhi SKUS Ltd., Kurkutbandhi, Jagardanga, Paschim Medinipur -711121, West Bengal
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The Revenue has raised several grounds of appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Ld. CIT(A)) dated 10.01.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The grounds include the allowance of additional evidence at the appellate stage, deletion of disallowance of deduction under section 80P, deletion of addition for unexplained cash deposit under section 69A, and deletion of addition for disallowance of provision for overdue interest. The assessee, Kurkutbandhi SKUS Ltd., was found to be engaged in accepting deposits and giving loans against such deposits to non-members, leading to disallowance of deduction under section 80P. The assessee deposited a large sum of cash during the demonetization period, which was added as unexplained money under section 69A. The assessee also made a provision for overdue interest, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Allowance of additional evidence at the appellate stage
- 2. Deletion of disallowance of ₹24,30,594/- under section 80P
- 3. Deletion of addition of ₹2,15,53,700/- for unexplained cash deposit under section 69A
- 4. Deletion of addition of ₹24,624/- for disallowance of provision for overdue interest
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Mundukhola Baksagarh SKUS Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-24
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedM/s. The India Cements Ltd. v. The DCIT, Corporate Circle-2(1), Chennai
Jaugram Gopalpur Skus Limited
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-2018AllowedBishnupur Rowtara Primary Agriculture Co-operative Credit Society Limited vs ITO Ward-41(1), Nadia
Kolkata benchAY 2020-2021Partly AllowedBurdwan Satgachia Janakalyan Society Vs. ITO Ward 1(1)
Usha Patodia Vs. ITO, Ward 30(1)
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed