Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Smt. Indira Vengala, sold her residential house at Dharam Karan Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad for a sum of Rs.70,00,000/- and purchased another house at Old Bowenpally Village for a sum of Rs.69,00,000/- during the same financial year. The assessee claimed exemption under Section 54(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the Assessing Officer denied the claim. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), who allowed the claim. The Revenue appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, which dismissed the appeal.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) rightly allowed the claim of deduction under Section 54(1) of the Act?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
1 precedent cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Mr. Suranjan Roy vs. ITO, Ward 62(1), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2016-17DismissedITA No. 6577/Del/2025 (A.Y 2017) ACIT Vs. Pushpa Aggarwal
Delhi benchMayura Mohta Vs. DCIT, Circle-29
Kolkata benchAY 2017-18AllowedKrishan Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer
Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18AllowedRamautar Saraf (HUF) Vs. ITO, Ward 59(3)
Kolkata benchAY 2016-17AllowedMrs. Lata Goel Vs. ACIT, Circle-06, New Delhi
Delhi bench